<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
         xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/tidbits/RSS">
  <title>Recent tidbits</title>
  <link>http://onenw.org</link>
  
  <description>
    
       
       
  </description>
  
  
  
            <syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
            <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
            <syn:updateBase>2008-03-12T19:34:50Z</syn:updateBase>
        
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/logo.jpg"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/wired-wealthy-report"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/respect-is-atte"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/annenberg-study"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/relationship-centric"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/can-spam-for-npnprofits"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/cultivating-new-subscribers"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/scheduling-meetings"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/all-marketers-are-liars"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/electronic-signatures"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/google-analytics"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/privacy-example"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/new-microsoft-updates"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/free-online-marketing-wisdom-from-marketing-sherpa"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/how-to-keep-website-visitors-coming-back"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onenw.org/toolkit/yousendit"/>
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>

    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/wired-wealthy-report">        <title>"The Wired Wealthy" - Great Report!</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/wired-wealthy-report</link>        <description>
&lt;p&gt;In March 2008, Convio, Sea Change Strategies and Edge Research released a report titled, "&lt;a class="external-link" href="http://www.convio.com/files/GD_WiredWealthy_Report.pdf"&gt;The Wired Wealthy: Using the Internet to Connect with Your Middle and Major Donors&lt;/a&gt;."&amp;nbsp; We think it's one of the most interesting, actionable pieces of online fundraising research we've ever read.&amp;nbsp; If you're part of our world, you need to read this report.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here's a quick snippet from the intro:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The wired wealthy are by definition engaged online and are generous givers. A closer look at demographics and practices adds some useful details.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, they are very generous givers. Wired wealthy say they give an average of $10,896 each year to various causes, with a median gift of $4,500. And they are notably wealthy. More than twenty-five percent (25%) have household incomes above $200,000 per year. More than half have annual household incomes above $100,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of the 13 participating charities and nonprofits that provided additional data, on average, high dollar donors make up about one percent (1%) of their records (high dollar defined as giving a cumulative total of $1,000 or more to the partner organization in an 18-month period). &lt;strong&gt;While small in numbers of people, that one percent (1%) is responsible for an average of thirty-two percent (32%) of the organization’s total dollars raised.&lt;/strong&gt; Partner organizations reported having, on average, email addresses for twenty-five (25%) of their $1,000+ donors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Demographically, wired wealthy are predominantly baby boomers (born between 1946 and 1964), with the center of gravity falling right in the middle of the baby boom cohort. And, they are extremely wired. They have been using the Internet for an average of 12 years. They are online an average of 18 hours per week. They know their way around the Web. They do their banking and bill paying online. They read the news online. They make purchases online. And, of course, most make charitable contributions online.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The wired wealthy have dabbled in various social networks and so-called "Web 2.0" venues, but do not appear to be among the heaviest adopters. &lt;/strong&gt;One exception may be YouTube – more than half of wired wealthy respondents have watched at least one video. A quarter of this group at least occasionally read blogs. Perhaps predictably, Facebook and MySpace do not represent fertile hunting grounds to find or engage the wired wealthy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-05-16T18:17:43Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/respect-is-atte">        <title>Seth Godin: Respect Earns Attention</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/respect-is-atte</link>        <description>
&lt;p&gt;Michael Gilbert &lt;a class="external-link" href="http://news.gilbert.org/2008/02/04#a6616"&gt;picks up&lt;/a&gt; on a &lt;a class="external-link" href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2008/01/permission-mark.html"&gt;great blog post by permission marketing consultant Seth Godin&lt;/a&gt;, in which he riffs on how patience, clarity and respect for permission are what earn you attention for your audience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Real permission is different from presumed or legalistic permission.
Just because you somehow get my email address doesn't mean you have
permission. Just because I don't complain doesn't mean you have
permission. Just because it's in the fine print of your privacy policy
doesn't mean it's permission either.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In order to get permission, you make a promise. You say, "I will do x,
y and z, I hope you will give me permission by listening." And then,
this is the hard part, that's all you do. You don't assume you can do
more. You don't sell the list or rent the list or demand more
attention. You can promise a newsletter and talk to me for years, you
can promise a daily RSS feed and talk to me every three minutes, you
can promise a sales pitch every day (the way &lt;a href="http://www.woot.com/"&gt;Woot&lt;/a&gt;
does). But the promise is the promise until both sides agree to change
it. You don't assume that just because you're running for President or
coming to the end of the quarter or launching a new product that you
have the right to break the deal. You don't.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If it sounds like you need humility and patience to do permission
marketing, you're right. That's why so few companies do it properly.
The best shortcut, in this case, is no shortcut at all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-02-05T15:09:13Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/annenberg-study">        <title>Surveying The Digital Future</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/annenberg-study</link>        <description>
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a title="external-link" href="http://www.digitalcenter.org/"&gt;Center for the Digital Future&lt;/a&gt; at the USC Annenberg School has &lt;a title="external-link" href="http://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/2007-Digital-Future-Report-Press-Release-112906.pdf"&gt;released the results of the sixth year of its "Surveying the Digital Future" project&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Six years of longitudinal research on use of broadband at home, the wireless Internet, on-line media, user-generated content and social networking.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interesting findings include:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;43 percent of Internet users who are members of online communities say that they feel as strongly about their virtual community as they do about their real-world communities.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;More than one-fifth of online community members (20.3 percent) take actions off-line at least once a year that are related to their online community.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Almost two-thirds of online community members who participate in social causes through the Internet (64.9 percent) say they are involved in causes that were new to them when they began participating on the Internet. And more than 40 percent (43.7 percent) of online community members participate more in social activism since they started participating in online communities.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;In spite of the recent growth of online communication by political parties and candidates, the number of users who say the Internet can be used as a tool to gain political power declined.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="external-link" href="http://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/2007-Digital-Future-Report-Press-Release-112906.pdf"&gt;Read the report here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2007-10-31T22:57:36Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/relationship-centric">        <title>Creating the Relationship-Centric Organization</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/relationship-centric</link>        <description>
&lt;p&gt;Our friend, colleague and fellow database consultant Paul Hagen has written an excellent piece for Idealware entitled "&lt;a href="http://www.idealware.org/articles/relationship_centric_org_CRM.php"&gt;Creating the Relationship-Centric Organization&lt;/a&gt;." 
In it, Paul does a great job of explaining the conceptual leap from
"donor databases" to "constituent relationship management" (CRM) --
thinking about ALL of the relationships your organization needs to
track, manage and grow:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
			Every nonprofit manages relationships with constituents, whether
			through a sophisticated tool or through scraps of paper, Excel
			spreadsheets, and miscellaneous databases. However, managing through
			these informal and decentralized methods is inefficient if not
			downright chaotic.... Isolated silos of contact data means that
			supporters may only hear about one aspect of the organization – for
			instance, they may hear about fundraising needs but miss communications
			that would tell them about accomplishments or volunteer needs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
			Poor management of constituent data translates to greater costs, lost revenue, and decreased impact.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
			&lt;b&gt;Is your organization Relationship-Centric?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
			How well is your organization doing with its CRM strategy? Our sector divides into four categories on this critical measure:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
			&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="center"&gt;
			&lt;img class="image-inline" src="/toolkit/CRM_matrix_003.gif/image_preview" alt="Paul Hagen CRM diagram" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Constituent Chaos. &lt;/span&gt;Some
				organizations have constituent data scattered everywhere. They have
				irregular, one-size-fits-all communications with supporters, and miss
				many opportunities to gain more value from constituents or grow
				relationships. These organizations can be described as being in a state
				of Constituent Chaos. They are underserving their organizations’
				mission by failing to engage supporters more robustly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Self-Centric.&lt;/span&gt;
				Self-Centric nonprofits have constituent data consolidated into one or
				only a few places (they are likely to be newer organizations with
				up-to-date systems), but focus their attention primarily inward rather
				than on interactions with the outside world. Like organizations in a
				state of constituent chaos, they do little to differentiate between
				their supporters and miss many opportunities to cross-promote different
				aspects of the organization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Enlightened Stone-age. &lt;/span&gt;Enlightened
				Stone-age nonprofits appreciate and actively seek to engage their
				constituents with high quality interactions, but a multiplicity of data
				collection mechanisms requires staff to jump through hoops to
				coordinate outreach.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Relationship-Centric.&lt;/span&gt;
				The organizations that have contact data consolidated in only a few
				places, have regular targeted interactions with constituents in which
				they cross-promote different aspects of the organization and create
				opportunities to grow the value of their constituents are
				Relationship-Centric nonprofits. They maximize their relationships with
				supporters: they regularly increase the average donation size and
				effectively engage an increasingly wide swath of constituents to take
				actions to meet the organization’s goals. &lt;br /&gt;
				&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
		If
your organization is thinking about how to improve your database
situation, Paul's article is a great background piece. The concepts he
describes are at the heart of ONE/Northwest database consulting
practice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read the whole article at:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.idealware.org/articles/relationship_centric_org_CRM.php"&gt;http://www.idealware.org/articles/&lt;br /&gt;relationship_centric_org_CRM.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2007-09-25T17:38:22Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/can-spam-for-npnprofits">        <title>CAN-SPAM For Nonprofits</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/can-spam-for-npnprofits</link>        <description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In late 2004, the U.S. government put out its final regulations for the CAN-SPAM act, which is intended to cut down on unsolicited email ("spam").&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nonprofits are not &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;exempt from CAN-SPAM!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our friends at Guidestar have some brief, helpful advice about &lt;a href="http://www.guidestar.org/news/features/can_e_mail.jsp"&gt;how to send email that complies with the CAN-SPAM act&lt;/a&gt;.  Their tips:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Send all e-mails from a legitimate, active e-mail address.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
If the recipient hits "Reply" and responds to the message, the answer
should go to an in-box that is monitored, not just disappear into
cyberspace.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Provide accurate header information and a postal address for the sender.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The "From" section of the e-mail should identify either the sender or
the organization, or both. The body of the message should contain a
snail-mail address.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Give the message an accurate subject line.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It is unlawful to use subject lines that mislead the recipient about the contents or subject matter of the message.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;When in doubt, err on the side of caution.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
If it's likely a recipient would view the message as an advertisement or promotion, put the word &lt;em&gt;Advertisement&lt;/em&gt; in the subject line or body of the e-mail, even if the message is related to your mission.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Provide recipients a way to opt out of future mailings.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Either include a link to a page where recipients can remove their
addresses or provide an e-mail address where they can write to have
their addresses removed.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;If someone opts out of future mailings, &lt;em&gt;respect their wishes.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have 10 days to remove them from your mailing list(s).&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2007-05-23T17:51:09Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/cultivating-new-subscribers">        <title>Cultivating Engagement From New List Members</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/cultivating-new-subscribers</link>        <description>&lt;p&gt;MRSS' Eve Fox has written a &lt;a href="http://www.mrss.com/news/Cultivating_New_List_Members_5-12-06.pdf"&gt;clear, concise guide to what kinds of messages you should send to get new email list members engaged&lt;/a&gt; with your organization.  Eve writes:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;If your goal is to cultivate good activists and/or donors, it seems you might be better served by skipping the "welcome" message(s) altogether. Data from tests we recently conducted for several of our nonprofit clients has shown that "welcome" messages are not the most effective first communication for new subscribers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;So What Does Work?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It might seem way too easy, but it appears that a typical action alert or fundraising appeal on your most current, most compelling issue/campaign is far more effective at engaging new list members – and retaining them – than a well-crafted welcome message!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bottom line: skip the small talk, and get right to an ask!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2007-03-06T18:05:51Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/scheduling-meetings">        <title>Scheduling Meetings: Two Tools That Help</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/scheduling-meetings</link>        <description>&lt;p&gt;We hate scheduling
meetings via email.  Fortunately, there are two great, free services
that take a lot of the pain out of meeting scheduling.  We think both are worth checking out the next time you need to "herd the cats" and schedule a meeting amongst far-flung colleagues.   They're infinitely preferable to shooting around dozens of emails and trying to keep track of everyone's free and busy times.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 class="Subheading"&gt;Meet-O-Matic&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.meetomatic.com" target="_self"&gt;http://www.meetomatic.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Meet-O-Matic is incredibly quick and simple.  Type in your name, your email, choose some times, and it gives you two hyperlinks: one to forward to anyone you want to join the meeting, and the other for you to view the responses and calcuate the best time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The only catch is that you can only specify "AM" and "PM" for a particuar day, not specific times.  That can be a drawback.  Still, Meet-O-Matic is one of the simplest tools out there, and there are absolutely no strings attached.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 class="Subheading"&gt;MeetingWizard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.meetingwizard.com" target="_self"&gt;http://www.meetingwizard.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;MeetingWizard is like Meet-O-Matic's grown up sister.  It's got more features, more power...  and is a bit more complex.   For example, MeetingWizard lets you specific specific times for your meeting (up to 12), download meetings to Microsoft Outlook, upload your address book to send invites, and more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you find Meet-O-Matic to be not quite powerful or flexible enough, then MeetingWizard is a great tool to try.  &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2007-03-06T18:05:51Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/all-marketers-are-liars">        <title>All Marketers Are Liars</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/all-marketers-are-liars</link>        <description>&lt;p&gt;Effective online organizing is a form of marketing (in the best sense of the word).  Online marketing expert Seth Godin, who draws heavily on the "tipping point" ideas of Malcolm Gladwell, gave &lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6909078385965257294&amp;amp;q=seth+godin" target="_self"&gt;an engaging and worthwhile talk at Google&lt;/a&gt;, where he covers the basics of this landscape, and talks about the power of telling authentic stories in a low-trust world. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's worth watching for anyone who needs to communicate about social change issues to the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jons</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2007-03-06T18:05:51Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/electronic-signatures">        <title>Signing Documents Electronically with EchoSign</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/electronic-signatures</link>        <description>
&lt;p&gt;If your organization frequently generates contracts, memoranda of understanding, or other things that require signatures from partners, you've probably experienced the frustration and hassle of shuffling the paper necessary to get these documents signed.  It often seems like this is the last possible use of the fax machine!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The continuing march of technological progress has finally started to offer some simple solutions to this problem.  Here at ONE/Northwest, we've started to use a web-based service called &lt;a href="http://www.echosign.com"&gt;EchoSign&lt;/a&gt; to manage the process of signing database and website development contracts with our partners.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EchoSign allows you to upload your document (signed or unsigned), request a signature and manage the entire signing process.  It shows you when things have been signed, converts final copies to PDF and sends them to all parties.  It also archives copies of your contracts online.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Digital signatures are legal.   According to &lt;a href="http://www.echosign.com/public/static/faq.jsp"&gt;the EchoSign FAQ&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act
(“E-Signature Act”) became effective in the US on October 1, 2000 deeming online electronic signatures on commercial transactions and
most other agreements have a legal status equivalent to a written
signature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="Learn more" href="http://www.echosign.com/static/AboutE-Signatures.pdf"&gt;Learn more&lt;/a&gt; about Electronic Signatures in the US and abroad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EchoSign is free for up to 10 documents per month, and $19.95 per user per month for unlimited signatures.  For power users who want to seamlessly integrate document signing with their database, EchoSign also offers integration with Salesforce.com.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More information at:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.echosign.com"&gt;http://www.echosign.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2007-03-06T18:05:56Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/google-analytics">        <title>Want Better Website Stats? Get Google Analytics!</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/google-analytics</link>        <description>
&lt;p&gt;
			We've
long been frustrated by the dearth of high-quality, low-cost website
statistics tool that make it easy to get information that you can
actually use to improve your site.  So, you can imagine how excited we
were when Google purchased Urchin, one of the most powerful commercial
webstats tools out there, changed its name to Google Analytics, and
started giving it out for free.  That's right, free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;If you are a small to mid-sized organization with a website, you should have a Google Analytics account.&lt;/b&gt;  It's just that simple. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It's easy.  Just go to &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/analytics/"&gt;http://www.google.com/analytics&lt;/a&gt; and sign up.  Google will give you a little chunk of code to place on each page of your website (or, better, in your website template) and in about a day, you'll be able to login and few your stats.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And while you're at it, check out Google's "&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/analytics/conversionuniversity.html"&gt;Conversion University&lt;/a&gt;" -- great tips on content optimization and website marketing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 class="Subheading"&gt;Update&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In May 2007, Google delivered a major upgrade to Google Analytics that makes an already-good tool really quite fantastic!  For a great rundown, &lt;a href="http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/2007/05/google-analytics-is-re-launched-do-these-five-things-first-in-v2.html"&gt;see this article by Avinash Kaushik&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2007-05-10T19:29:31Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/privacy-example">        <title>A Great Model Privacy Policy</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/privacy-example</link>        <description>
&lt;p&gt;Our friends at &lt;a href="http://www.sightline.org" target="_self"&gt;Sightline Institute&lt;/a&gt; have written a privacy policy for their beautiful new website that is a model of thoroughness, thoughtfulness and plain English usage.&amp;nbsp; If you're looking for an example privacy policy for grassroot advocacy groups, you could do far worse than to start with theirs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check it out at &lt;a href="http://www.sightline.org/site/privacy_policy" target="_self"&gt;http://www.sightline.org/site/privacy_policy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some other sample privacy policies include:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;ONE/Northwest Privacy Policy&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://www.onenw.org/about/privacy" href="../../about/privacy"&gt;http://www.onenw.org/about/privacy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;1Sky Washington&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="external-link" href="http://www.1skywashington.org/about/privacy"&gt;&amp;nbsp;http://www.1skywashington.org/about/privacy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Washington Environmental Council&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wecprotects.org/home/privacy_policy.cfm"&gt;http://www.wecprotects.org/home/privacy_policy.cfm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Idaho Conservation League&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wildidaho.org/privacy.php"&gt;http://www.wildidaho.org/privacy.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;WhatCounts&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.whatcounts.com/bin/display?d=/company/privacy.html&amp;amp;t=/main/company.html"&gt;http://www.whatcounts.com/bin/display?d=/company/privacy.html&amp;amp;t=/main/company.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;EAGLE&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eaglelaw.org/about/privacy"&gt;http://www.eaglelaw.org/about/privacy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2008-04-01T00:14:03Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/new-microsoft-updates">        <title>Microsoft Updates Update Process: You Should Update</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/new-microsoft-updates</link>        <description>&lt;p&gt;Most ONEList readers (except you lucky Mac users) are likely
familiar with Windows Update, Windows' built-in automatic updates
function. (Don't get all smug: Apple has an equivalent feature, called
Software Update.)&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has launched a new update service, called Microsoft
Update, that includes both Windows and Office security updates in a
single, streamlined process. It's a pretty nice system, and we
recommend that you switch over to it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The catch?  You have to choose to use Microsoft Update instead of Windows Update. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fortunately, switching to Microsoft Update is really easy.  Just go to &lt;a href="http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/"&gt;http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com&lt;/a&gt;. On the right side you'll see a link to 'Microsoft Update'. Follow those prompts to install the new updating system.&lt;/p&gt;</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2007-03-06T18:05:51Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/free-online-marketing-wisdom-from-marketing-sherpa">        <title>Free Online Marketing Wisdom from Marketing Sherpa</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/free-online-marketing-wisdom-from-marketing-sherpa</link>        <description>&lt;p&gt;The folks at &lt;a href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com" target="_self"&gt;Marketing Sherpa&lt;/a&gt;, who consistently produce some of the best research and advice on online marketing out there, have released their &lt;a href="http://wisdom.marketingsherpa.com/" target="_self"&gt;2006 Wisdom Report&lt;/a&gt;, which contains real-world lessons from over a hundred for-profit and nonprofit online marketing practitioners.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are lots of good nuggets in here for email, website and direct mail outreach, and how these tools can play together in an integrated communications strategy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jons</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2007-03-06T18:05:50Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/how-to-keep-website-visitors-coming-back">        <title>How To Keep Website Visitors Coming Back?</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/how-to-keep-website-visitors-coming-back</link>        <description>&lt;p&gt;Usability guru Jakob Nielsen a big question in a &lt;a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/search_engines.html" target="_self"&gt;recent Alertbox column&lt;/a&gt;.  Well worth pondering for folks thinking about the intersection of online and offline organizing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The question is: How can websites devote more of their budgets to
keeping customers, rather than simply advertising for new visitors?
Here are some ideas, ranging from the proven (newsletters) to the
speculative (mobile services):
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a title="Nielsen Norman Group: report on Email Newsletter Usability, with 127 design guidelines for subscription interfaces, newsletter content and account maintenance based on user research" class="old" href="http://www.nngroup.com/reports/newsletters/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Email newsletters&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
Getting people to sign up for regular newsletters remains the ultimate
way to maintain a relationship. As usability studies show, a newsletter
has much more of an emotional impact on people than a brief visit to a
website.
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a title="Alertbox on reversing the direction of marketing to a user pull" class="old" href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20001015.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Request marketing&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Have users tell you what they want, and then alert them when you have it.
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Discussion groups&lt;/strong&gt; and other community
features. Find ways to recognize particularly active members and thus
further connect them to your site. Such recognition might be as simple
as placing gold stars on their profiles or might include more
substantial &lt;a title="Alertbox: Loyalty on the Web" class="old" href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9708a.html"&gt;loyal-user benefits&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a title="Alertbox sidebar: Affiliate Programs" class="old" href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990711_affiliates.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affiliate programs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. These are alliances with other sites that promote &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; services to &lt;em&gt;their&lt;/em&gt;
users in return for a referral fee if their users do business with you.
The program works best if the referring site can honestly recommend the
destination site to its own target audience. So, even though you have
to pay them a cut, the cost isn't boundless the way it is on search
engines because you're not competing with all other sites in the world
for the right to be listed. If you're the best match for the referring
site's audience, they'll want you -- rather than simply whoever offers
the highest fee -- because your conversion rate will be better. (In an
earlier column, I offer &lt;a title="Alertbox: “Why Doc Searls Doesn't Sell Any Books" class="old" href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000806.html"&gt;an example&lt;/a&gt; in which sales differed drastically depending on which affiliate partner a site chose to link to.)
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Newsfeeds.&lt;/strong&gt; RSS might work, but I don't know yet as we're not starting our user research into RSS until next week. (We'll present &lt;a title="Nielsen Norman Group: tutorial description of training course about the usability of email newsletters and RSS/newsfeeds" class="new" href="http://www.nngroup.com/events/tutorials/newsletter.html"&gt;findings about RSS usability&lt;/a&gt; at our upcoming conference.)
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Stick your URL onto any physical product&lt;/strong&gt; you sell in the hope that customers will see it when they need supplies or a replacement.
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A hardware component&lt;/strong&gt; that's hardwired to connect to your site's service.  Without the iPod, the iTunes music store wouldn't be nearly as successful.
&lt;strong&gt;Mobile features&lt;/strong&gt;. Search engines'
back-and-forth interaction style is clumsier on mobile devices.
Conversely, mobile provides added value for services that know their
users and understand sufficient context to give them exactly what they
need, when they need it -- perhaps without their having to ask. Thus,
users are more likely to actually subscribe to mobile services than to
seek them out every time they feel the need. Being an icon on
somebody's BlackBerry gives you top-of-mind presence and significantly
increases the likelihood that that they'll visit your website when they
want to do business. (You might even get paid for the mobile service --
but even without payment, it's worth it in search-liberation points.)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the dot-com bubble days, it was fashionable to discuss website &lt;strong&gt;stickiness&lt;/strong&gt;.
Now, stickiness must be reconceptualized for the real world rather than
the bubble. It's not a goal to make users spend hours on your site. Let
them go about their business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The real goal is to &lt;strong&gt;make users come back&lt;/strong&gt;, and to
have them come directly to your site instead of clicking on expensive
ads. The ideas above are just a few ways to encourage repeat business.
Further in-depth studies of user behaviors and customer needs should
reveal many new ways of keeping users loyal.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jons</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2007-03-06T18:05:50Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://onenw.org/toolkit/yousendit">        <title>YouSendIt.com: a simple, free solution for sending files that are too big to email</title>        <link>http://onenw.org/toolkit/yousendit</link>        <description>&lt;p&gt;If ever you need
to email someone a really big file -- something with lots of hi-res
pictures, etc.- generally, anything that's bigger than 1MB -- you may
have difficulties getting it through. Many email servers will not
accept messages that large. But wait! All is not lost. Check out:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yousendit.com/"&gt;http://www.yousendit.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's a simple,
free service that lets you upload files and then emails the person (or
people) that you want to receive the file. They get a link in the email
that lets them download. It's free, no FTP hassling, no email limits.
The files are only avaiable for a week, so it's not a long-term file
distribution solution, but it is a quick and handy tool.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While process is
reasonably secure, we don't recommend distributing your secrets this
way, but then again, you shouldn't be emailing highly confidential
information anyway, right?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>jons</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2007-03-06T18:05:50Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Tidbit</dc:type>    </item>




</rdf:RDF>
